On May 18, the House of Representatives approved an increase in the National Endowment for the Arts' budget in Fiscal Year 2007 to $129.4 million.
Just to put that in perspective: the financially strapped city of Berlin is aiming to reduce the municipal subsidy to its three opera houses to a mere $126 million by 2009.
The March 20, 2003 attack on Dora Farms near Baghdad (the attempt to kill Saddam Hussein at the outset of the Iraq War) utilized (wasted might be a better word) at least 36 Tomahawk missiles. At a cost of $750,000 apiece, that comes to $27,000,000. That represents two and a half months of federal arts funding in America, thrown out the door in a couple of hours.
To appreciate the true financial cost of the Iraq War, well, let's just say the meter is running. Now imagine, just as a wild sort of fantasy, that all the money allocated for the Iraq War would instead be directed to the NEA. (Crazy, I know, but bear with me here.) If maintained at the current budget level, that would mean that the NEA would be funded through the year...4215. Yes, I know, you have to factor for inflation. So let's be conservative and say the NEA would be safe at least till the year 3000.
On a less fantastical note, the $285 billion for the Iraq War would be enough to allow nearly 38,000,000 children to attend the Head Start program, or enough to hire nearly 5 million additional public school teachers for one year. Remember all this next time some blowhard gets riled about some controversial art and starts attacking NEA funding as being a horrible waste of taxpayer dollars. Perspective is always useful. That's you, Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina, I'm talking to...for voting for the (thankfully, failed) amendment to cut NEA funding by $30 million.